Demandbase, InsideView $3.7M Data Privacy Settlement
If you lived in AL, CA, IL, IN, NV, OH or SD, were not a registered InsideView or Demandbase user, and a free user viewed your InsideView profile, you may qualify for a cash payment. Submit a claim by October 30, 2025.
Who Is Eligible?
You are a class member if you meet all of the criteria below:
- Resident of one of the following states during the listed periods:
Alabama: Dec 2019–Feb 2022
California: Dec 2019–Feb 2022
Illinois: Dec 2020–Feb 2022
Indiana: Dec 2019–Feb 2022
Nevada: Dec 2017–Feb 2022
Ohio: Dec 2017–Feb 2022
South Dakota: Dec 2019–Feb 2022 - You were not a registered user of InsideView or Demandbase.
- A free user viewed your InsideView profile during the applicable period.
If you received a notice by mail or email, you were identified as potentially eligible.
Potential Payment Amount
The $3.7 million fund is allocated by state. All approved claimants within a state will split that state’s fund pro rata after fees and costs.
- Alabama: $325,575
- California: $729,088.50
- Illinois: $501,975
- Indiana: $320,445
- Nevada: $115,256.25
- Ohio: $1,699,830.25
- South Dakota: $7,830
Final payments depend on the number of valid claims in each state.
How to File a Claim
- Locate the Unique ID (and PIN for online filing) on your settlement notice.
- Choose one of these methods:
- Submit the online claim form
- Download, print, complete and mail the PDF claim form to the administrator.
Mailing Address
InsideView Right-of-Publicity Settlement Administrator
PO Box 2319
Portland, OR 97208-2319
Payout Methods
- Venmo
- Zelle
- Paper check
Key Dates
- Exclusion / Objection Deadline: Sept 30 2025
- Final Approval Hearing: Oct 21 2025
- Claim Filing Deadline: Oct 30 2025
- Estimated Payout: ~46 days after final approval & appeals (if any)
Why Was There a Lawsuit?
Plaintiffs alleged Demandbase Inc. and InsideView Technologies Inc. used their names, contact details, job titles, education histories and other personal information in marketing databases without consent, violating right-of-publicity laws. The companies deny wrongdoing but agreed to a settlement to avoid further litigation costs. The deal also requires changes to how InsideView displays teaser profiles.